Nepal: The Royal Massacre & the Mystery Unfolding

Ashutosh Shrivastav
USA
“Monarchy is over in Nepal”. The same title is being used in fashionable ways by many media in this world. The biggest stake holder and the director of Nepal’s devastation is Nepal’s closest neighbor, India. Even though the intellectuals are familiar with this direction, I would like to show why the world remains anonymous of the India’s sponsorship of terrorism in Nepal. Quite surprisingly, the actors have created a huge mass of junior actors in the hope to make them a lead actor one day. Let’s trace back when the director thought to direct this inhuman movie that might not leave the director an option of bankruptcy if the truth is exposed.

As known to the world, Nepal was a Kingdom and the most peaceful country in this chaotic earth. The Indo-Nepal friction started when the then Prime Minister of Nepal—Jung Bahaur Rana—supported the British India to suppress the Sepoy mutiny. In 1857, India could have born, but since the Rana prime ministers of Nepal were strong allies of British, they supported British in their mission to crush any independence revolution. In fact, Nepal had already become an enemy of Indians by then. Moreover, the strength of Gurkha army was the biggest obstacle for the Indians to overcome. Because of Rana’s support for British India, later known as India could not gain independence until 1947. Many of us forget to note, immediately after India was born, the Rana Empire was thrown out in Nepal in the year 1950. Until 1950, Ranas were the prime rulers of Nepal and the monarchy was only symbolic.

There was another family who was fighting for the Indian state with the Indians—the Koiralas. Koiralas were Indians who were born in the Northern Province of British India –modern day of Bihar or Uttar Pradesh in India. Koiralas’ were three brothers who were born and raised in India. The family claims to be originally from Nepal, however, their roots and bushes have been found only in India. Even today, much of Koirala family resides in India—respecting the motherland. The Koirala brothers joined struggled to give birth to India. During the later years when India was about to born, Koiralas were suggested to form Nepal Congress Party within India. Finally India was born in 1947. Most of the princely states were to join the Union of India. One of the biggest Kingdoms was the Kingdom of Jammu and Kashmir. Raja Hari Singh decided not to surrender his Kingdom to either of the countries. However, using coercive measures, India annexed the Kingdom into its Union. It is interesting to see how Indian text books claim this beautiful Kingdom a part of India. In the last days of 1948, a ceasefire was agreed under UN auspices demanding plebiscite. Nehru never proceeded with the UN resolution and hence, the authenticity of the instrument of accession is questionable. The Kingdom— falsely claimed by India and Pakistan as their territories—is still considered as the international disputed territory. Then India annexed the Kingdom of Gwalior, and the Kingdom of Hyderabad. By all means, they were illegal annexation. India’s vulture eyes were gazing the Kingdom of Sikkim and the Kingdom of Nepal. The Indian Congress had helped create Nepali congress because they had foreseen their fortune in Nepal. The Koiralas were assured by the Indians that they would help Nepal merge into India if the Indians help throw the Rana regime in Nepal. In 1950, King Tribhuwan fled to India to seek refuge from the Ranas. The only Royal member left was the 3 year old, the then prince Gyanendra. The Indians had thought to end the monarchy in 1950, but the Ranas, moving a mile ahead, crowned the 3 year old as the King of the Kingdom of Nepal. The Koiralas’ and the Indians’ dream shattered. Even though the Ranas were able to save Nepal’s monarchy, unfortunately, their Empire was brought down. Since Ranas were the true Nationalists, their downfall encouraged India to envision a possibility to annexing Nepal into India.

Not that easy as the Indians had presumed. The King in Nepal was considered the reincarnation of Hindu God, and replacing the institution of Monarchy was their far dream. Nevertheless, India did not stay quiet, and offered Sikkim and Nepal to sign the instrument of accession and join the Union of India . Nepal’s the then King Mahendra got infuriated with the proposal, whereas the “Koirala equivalent” prime Minister of Sikkim offered Sikkim in the hands of India, only to be slaughtered. The three Koirala brothers became the prime ministers of Nepal on the recommendation and pressure from India. This paved an easy way for the Indians to observe Nepal more closely. King Birendra declared Nepal as the Zone of Peace in the early 1970s. This was endorsed by more than 116 countries of the world, except India. King Birendra’s popularity almost made India’s dream a nightmare. Moreover, the future King Dipendra was one of the most popular figures of Nepalese monarchy in the history.

As a next move, India helped launch a Maoist revolution in Nepal to break Nepal. The Maoists’ top demand was the abolition of Monarchy. Since the year 1996, India started funding Nepal Maoists to fight against state. As the Maoist party was formed in 1996, their leaders were backed up by the Indian government. Most of the Maoists leader lived in Darjeeling, Lucknow, and Delhi in India and masterminded their plan. In other words, India created Communism in Nepal. They also were supported by the Indian Communist leaders and other Naxalite groups who are fighting against the Indian government for communism. Surprisingly India never helped Nepal government in arresting those leaders and extraditing them in Nepal. Hence it is evident that India never wanted peace in Nepal. At the same time, international media was busy defaming the King Gyanendra.

The interesting chemistry was all political parties held discussions in India with the Maoists in the Indian authority’s presence. The irony was Maoists were able to kill Inspector General of Police of the Royal Nepalese Government, but were not able to kill any leaders. This does not digest well. These Maoists and leaders were in agreement not to kill each others leaders. Although India was successful in proving why they did not endorse “Zone of Peace”, they were unable to offer prayers to King. Then India played the worst game with the help of its own citizens—Koiralas, and Maoists to end the Nepalese monarchy—which the world today knows as the Nepal’s Royal Massacre.

After the Royal Massacre, many speculations were in the air. However, immediately after the incident, media, which are funded by India, started to air against Gyanendra, who was the only heir left to the throne. India’s, Koirala’s and Maoists’ strategy was to defame monarchy and most importantly, the monarch who was unknown to the world. India knew that King Birendra was most popular and if the blame could be dumped on Gyanendra, it would be the easiest way to uproot monarchy. India had a sound plan to kill the Royal Family so that no one else would remain alive to keep the monarchy breathing. However, the massacre happened when King Gyanendra was out of town and presumably was on the way back to the massacre site for the dinner. Gyanendra was crowned again as the King of Nepal, and India, once again, could not prove to be a successful director. The love and respect for the King was then seen by the shaved head of all the Nepalese—who respected Nepalese Monarch as their father. Noticeably, the present Prime Minster, Girija Prasad, the same Indian Citizen, was the Prime Minister of Nepal during the Royal Massacre. He helped India facilitate the killings. Later, he also facilitated King Gyanendra, to be removed from the palace. In other words, the Koiralas were well aware of the killings, but instead of stopping India to kill the royals, the old traitor helped them successfully execute the plan.

The King wanted the then prime minister Sher Bahadur Deuba to hold the elections but even after he was granted to extend the date of election twice, he was never motivated to hold the election. The underlying political reason was that he continuously wanted to be in his office by postponing the election. As the Head of the State, King Gyanendra could not wait to see his country devastated. Subsequently, in October 2002, King Gyanendra dismissed the prime minister and his cabinet. The King, citing dissatisfaction with the government, dissolved the government in 2005 and declared a state of emergency. However, monarch retained absolute power until April 2006.

When King Gyanendra ascended throne in 2002, Nepal has been going through civil war since a decade or so. Politicians of Nepal, as an easy excuse to take benefit from inexperienced King imposed blame on him. While most of Nepalese were pleased to see the progress under Royal rule, the corrupted people became unemployed. The leaders of Nepal are barely educated to find a job, if they do not engage themselves into politics. These led the politicians ally together and form a coalition to fight against the King. Countable 10-15 people gathered for to restore democracy and started protest. It was not until April 2006, when Maoists joined the movement to fight against king. Truck loaded Maoists entered the capital city to revolt. As a way to spread violence, Maoists attacked on Maoists in the revolution process and charged King for their deaths. After 30 people were killed, the King gave up all the powers and reinstated the parliament. Hence, the King who wanted to make the country progress was iconized as a dictator.

Now that the monarchy is gone, common Nepalese who are die hard fans of King are looking for their God. However, Hinduism and Buddhism have not taught violence to the Nepalese. Maybe that’s why common Nepalese are not on the streets yet. I remain unanswered, is Hinduism’s patience tested? Is Gurkhas’ blood being tested? Are the Nepalese tested? Nepal has so far witnessed the Maoists crowd, not the Nepali crowd, there will be a day when Gurkhalis will be on the streets to show the bravery of Amar Singh Thapa, Bir Balbhadra Kunwar, Bhimsen Thapa, or another Jung Bahadur Rana…and who knows, another Prithvi Narayan Shah to Unify the breaking Nepal.

Fall of Greed Emperor Girija Prasad Koirala

Fall of Greed Emperor Girija Prasad Koirala Girija Prasad is gone. Congratulations to all patriots and democrats. Today is the victory day for the people wishing to see Nepal, a prosperous and democratic. Girija Prasad Koirala, as you all know has been playing dirty politics since long. He ousted Ganesh Man Singhji and Kishunji from Nepali Congress. This person tried to defame the great leader, BP Koirala saying he forced the Nepali Congress youths of the time for money laundering, smuggling and so on. This Girija Prasad Koirala along with Ram Chandra Poudel, Krishna Sitaula and Nara Hari Acharya forced to follow the principles of Maoists thereby turning Nepali Congress, a party without principle. The moral-less, ethic-less, corrupt Girija Prasad Koirala is the one who saw his kins and relatives are more important than Nepal and Nepalese. This person never valued the democratic norms and values. It is because of this person, Nepal is approaching towards the failed state status. Nepal's development infrastructures have completely been destroyed because of Girija Prasad Koirala and his stooges who enjoyed powers throughout the post 1990 movement. Under the leadership of this power monger leader Girija Prasad Koirala, Nepali Congress was divided. He is trying to divide Nepali Congress once again by saying he made a grave mistake by accepting the unification of Nepali Congress. It should be the lesson for Nepali Congress party members to relieve Girija Prasad Koirala for good. Failure might see the division in Nepali Congress very soon and every high ranking party positions will be occupied by his close relatives as if Nepali Congress is the party of Koiralas. We request all who follow democratic values and norms to ask for the relieve of Nepali Congress Party President Girija Prasad Koirala and bring back Krishna Prasad Bhattarai, Tara Nath Ranabhatt and others in Nepali Congress. At the same time, we also request Nepali Congress members to rejuvenate the real principles of Nepali Congress i. e., Constitutional Monarchy, Hindu Nation, Rule of Law, Multi-party polity based on fair competition and people's sovereignty. These are the principles upon which Nepali Congress relied for sixty years and could withstand left extremisms. To withstand left extremisms in future, there is no alternative to Nepali Congress than to follow its own principles. The borrowed philosophy, 'Federal Democratic Republic Nepal', should be discarded by the Nepali Congress and demand for the referendum on important issues and this will ultimately show Nepali Congress as pro-people party. People will start taking it as the party that hears their voices. Lastly, we once again congratulate all patriots and democrats for the fall of power monger leader of Nepali Congress, Girija Prasad Koirala.

Monarchy is a Must

Bishal Shah
The Nepali Nationalists Organization (NNO) USA, believes that Nepali People should always think about to keep their royal institution for long. It is the symbol of Nepali national unity. It is the prestige and pride for the Nepali people. No one can imagine that the killer like Pushpa Kamal Dahal (Prachanda), Girija Koirala who has masterminded to hijack twin-otter plane in 70s which carried a huge national revenue and still he did not have answered whereabouts of that wealth, Madhav Kumar Nepal whose height is barely above 5 feet with no charm at all and Sher Bahadur Deuba who does not understand himself what he spoke or Pashupati SJB Rana, Surya Bahadur Thapa, Lokendra B. Chand, Regional Madhesi leaders -anyone can present Nepal's image outside Nepal. As far as inside Nepal, except His Majesty King Gyanendra, there is no one who can unite a nation and bring all Nepali together. Every people within their deep heart has a place for King Gyanendra. Whoever speaks whatever, still, inside their heart there is a love and respect towards King Gyanendra. It is the foreigners who wish Nepal being turned into Christian nation or who wants to hijack all natural resources love to see Nepali people without their guardian, Monarchy. Therefore, true patriots of Nepal are completely right when they say Nepal is no more sovereign and independent nation. Nepal will have lesser status than Bhutan without King. One of Nepal's well-wishers, the Political Science Professor Dr. Jenny Curzine from France always argues in favor of monarchy. She always says: we have no Monarchy now. Our Monarchs were projected as villains in the history but that is not hundred percent true. During their rule France used to be the number one nation. We were powerful and richer than the United States of today. There is no country will ever be as equal as France during the rule of our Monarchs. We had prestige, power and in fact, we reached the height of progress. Nepal was also moving towards progress during Kings rule. I am not against the democracy, but the democratic leaders ruined Nepal. They stagnated country and they put Nepal under the feet of India. King Gyanendra is sacrificing everything for the people of Nepal. If he wanted the Nepalese people would have swept away the Jana Andolan II very easily. If he had just requested the people to stop, Jana Andolan II would have gone in a thin air. At last, King is a must for Nepal otherwise, expect Nepal, a federal state of Greater India or federated nations of different names and with different flags. And then, definitely, there will be no four star flags, no flags with sun or Cow or something else. People will be greeted with the flags of Tiranga (Indian Flag) or with the flag of hammer and sickle (international communist's flag) or with different regional flags like in former Yugoslavia. No matter how the Constituent Assembly election gives the result, Nepali leaders must unite themselves and save Monarchy for the sake of Nepal's future. The leaders must think that the result of CA is not an end in itself. It has a big responsibility of drafting a new Constitution. The people must be given the final say on a new Constitution through the referendum. Lacking this will lead towards the real revolution that Nepal has never witnessed in its history, nationalists defending Constitutional Monarchy and Hindu Dharma at one side and the parties defending India's interests and imported religions at the other. The result is evident. (On behalf of the Nepali Nationalists Organization NNO), USA, Chairman, Bishal B. Shah)